Hoping Man

Monday, April 24, 2006

Identity Theft

Google is taking over the world. But it sure is useful. That's gotta count for something.

I just Googled my name, and the results were quite interesting. I'm feeling a lot less unique right now.

  1. Darren Hoffman - A designer in the field of brand communications. His work looks very good.
  2. Darren Hoffman - A 'Miscellaneous' movie crew guy. Haven't heard of any of the movies.
  3. Darren Hoffman - Some sort of acne expert.
  4. Darren Hoffman - Don't know much about him, but he sure loves geneology! (maybe we're related)
  5. Darren Hoffman - Communications Director for the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank
  6. Darren Hoffman - Soil Conservationist (Pest Management) at the Ralls County Field Office of the US Department of Agriculture

Having finally realized that this is probably interesting to no one but me, I'll stop there. Maybe you could try Googling your own name. It might be more interesting.

Sunday, April 23, 2006

A Strange Success

Having heard several references over the years to The Christian Science Monitor as a legitimate news source, I did some digging. The CBC regularly interviews on-the-ground CSM reporters as if they were from CNN, CBS, or what have you. I am not a Christian Scientist (I am, however, a Christian engineer), and am not seeking to promote or attack Christian Science in this post, but I find the success of this publication very odd and encouraging all at once.

First, I expect that - like me - most people would be skeptical about reading a newspaper with this title. Aside from reading out of curiosity, I can't see many people choosing The Christian Science Monitor over say, The Globe and Mail or any other mainstream paper. I'm not looking to view my news through the lens of Christian Science, and if the paper isn't slanted in that direction then why imply it in the very title?

But then again, what do titles like The Toronto Star or The New York Times tell me about their paper's history or bias? If I was trying to take over the world through subtle suggestions in a biased newspaper, I wouldn't call it The Brainwasher. Maybe the CSM's straightforward title should give me more assurance of honest reporting within.

The CSM was born out of protest to bad journalism. Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of Christian Science, had a run-in with Joseph Pulitzer, a newspaper publisher who thought she was a quack. She launched the CSM shortly thereafter, and ironically it has since won seven Pulitzer Prizes.

From the CSM website:


In an age of corporate conglomerates dominating news media, the Monitor combination of church ownership, a public-service mission, and commitment to covering the world (not to mention the fact that it was founded by a woman shortly after the turn of the century, when US women didn't yet have the vote!) gives the paper a uniquely independent voice in journalism.

Unlike most US dailies, the Monitor does not rely primarily on wire services, like AP and Reuters, for its international coverage. We have writers based in 11 countries, including Russia, China, France, the UK, Kenya, Mexico, Israel and India, as well as throughout the US.


I can't think of an unlikelier success story. That's the encouraging part. Unlikely success stories are always encouraging on some level. I disagree with the teachings of Christian Science, but should that stop me from trying out their newspaper? I think not.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

The Trouble With Blogging -or- Integrity? Who Needs It!


Are you a person of integrity? How far does this go? Do you act exactly the same way regardless of who is around you? Is there any room within integrity for acting differently with different people, or does that always make one less integrous? Is integrous actually a word, or should that be 'integrated'? I'm fine with either one ... does that make me less integrou ... {danger, infinite blog loop error imminent}

Before anyone thinks I'm secretly in a biker gang or something, my point is that blogging forces one to choose how one is going to write; to choose an audience. The humour one uses, for example, might be humour one would normally only unleash around certain people, but whatever is blogged is available to all. Take that first paragraph. I have two friends from my former place of employment who eat that sort of thing for breakfast, and who come up with far better 'quirky wordsmith' fare than that. Others who read the blog might find that sort of thing strange or - in my wife's case - unsettling. I'm just not sure I'm ready for all of my worlds to come together.

Maybe I should be glad that I have different worlds, and that nobody really has any clue what to expect from this blog. Yes! All this time I've been searching for the unifying theme my blog should have, when really the lack of such a theme is a far more desirable thing! How sad it would be if this blog was called 'Sax Chat', and all I was known for was my love of the saxophone. The theme is me! This doesn't solve the 'mixing worlds' problem, but it makes me feel better in a strange kind of way.

For the record:
  1. Integrity is important
  2. I really do love saxophones, and the one in the picture would make a wonderful gift